Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed
Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed
Blog Article
Since there does not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data in existence for this Load, can a number of you supply a starting point with this combination and things to consider when Functioning this Load up?
I have applied H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There are not numerous cartridges which i use it for as I feel normally to gravitate to other powders. However, I am unable to declare that it won't do the job. It is simply that Various other powders operate greater for the presented cartridge. As an example, during the 280, H4831 gave me very good velocity and very great teams with Nosler one hundred forty AB. Having said that, RL19 was marginally improved in precision, even though the velocity was pretty much identical.
WARNING: This products can expose you to steer, which is known for the Condition of California to induce most cancers and birth defects or other reproductive hurt. To find out more head to – .
Sweet!! I am going to pick some up and give it a consider. Thank you guys, I take pleasure in it! I am going to let you really know what I determine. I do have a few 50 percent pound of 4350 I'm able to check out that first and see what occurs.
IMR powders also preform very well for me with a single noteworthy exception. All the chrongraphing I have performed with them indicates the velecity is consistant previously mentioned 32 levels but starts to differ when the temp starts to fall. The nearer to zero I get the more they differ. I've found around 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 from the Winter season time all-around here. Have not witnessed this with a lot of the other powders.
I am aware, rough periods. H4831SC will certainly function, I just did not like the case density when loaded very long. I do not don't forget powder charge off the h4831sc highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that is where by I normally aim to generally be. With your case making use of what you've got (and what I ought to have accomplished) I would begin with the top of the bearing surface area of the bullet appropriate in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you discover a velocity node.
I do not like to work up a load using a single wide range of powder after which you can have to operate up again simply because I run out and have to start using a new lot range.
Like said over, identical things. Everything is different is the dimensions from the kernels. I did hear someplace that they are going to only make the SC Later on. I have no idea if that may be accurate or not but would sound right to me. I exploit SC mainly because that's what I located in the 8 lb jug and it works.
I've located the precise reverse to generally be true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g h4831 vs h4831sc Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally correct powder in my 300 Win Mag.
Liberalism; The unattainable nonetheless recognized notion that it's entirely doable to pick up a turd because of the clean conclusion.
Kansas City, MO I would grab no matter what is offered at the moment. I’ve employed each although with my go to load and didn’t see anything distinctive general performance clever.
It has been a bit, but I did h4831 vs h4831sc get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 5 shot team these days. It can be a little slower than H1000, but shoots very good. Many thanks for the recommendation, it's excellent to are aware that I have got choices when one particular or the opposite powder is dried up.
I typically generally have the sc version. Utilizing a powder measure it hangs up much less due to shorter kernels and I think permits a lot more dependable metering so significantly less time you take trickling in the final bit of cost to make bodyweight. So in essence the SC saves you times
I discovered that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions had been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min rates. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it absolutely was a very low 60s grain charge in a Norma scenario. Not what I was on the lookout for, but precise nonetheless.